Marketing, Advertisting & Communication in Iowa

25 Responses to “Keith Olbermann Top 9/11 Story: The Promotion Of Failure”

1. 6orillamask on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   yes he is a fraud 9 …
   yes he is a fraud 9-11 was CLEARLY an inside job

2. agreeableviews816 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   Olbermann is a …
   Olbermann is a fraud!
   9/11 was an inside job!
   He knows the complete truth and he lies!
   May he be punished justly!

3. agreeableviews816 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   ur in tellin me …
   ur in tellin me
   haha someone doesnt like my last comment.

4. rystyube on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   Sure - but he is in …
   Sure - but he is in the mainstream media he has to work within that framework. The mainstream media have to tow the government line, or they get in trouble. That’s what happens in a fascist society.

5. agreeableviews816 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   thats so in …
   thats so in retarded - he aint a truthseeker, cuz if he was, he’d know that 9/11 was an inside job, its the missing piece to the Olbermann story

6. BorislavX on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   Keith is a piece of …
   Keith is a piece of trash.

7. BorislavX on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   Keith is a piece of …
   Keith is a piece of trash.

8. vivwritten on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   in any other …
   in any other democracy these people would of been railroaded out of government and probably executed….so i guess the US isn’t a democracy

9. engfant on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

   Every TV station …
   Every TV station should be showing this on a loop.

   Bravo Keith. Bravo.

10. booblebobble on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    keith is my hero.
    …
    keith is my hero.
    PAUL/OLBERMANN 2008!!!

11. mikexxxxnolan on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    The video clip is …
    The video clip is OK but many Americans will be able to read about the 9/11 cover-up when President George Walker Bush publishes his memoirs when his term has ended. The prior warning of the 5th September 2001 should have prevented 9/11 from happening and suppressing it is a disgrace.

12. lennhart on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Congress ought NOT …
    Congress ought NOT to have abrogated any portion of what was delegated ONLY to Congress by the Constitution. ALL such measures are unconstitutional. Admittedly, Congress ARE a ! Both parties sold us out. Attempts to rewrite Geneva, however, are in violation of Geneva to which we are still bound. Like Bush’s “capital” war crimes in Iraq, congress’ actions are, likewise, punishable by death.

13. bernhard12345 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    I hate CIA …
    I hate CIA productions.

14. 22cmonkey22 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Watch “Osama Bin …
    Watch “Osama Bin Laden 6th Anniversary Video” on youtube

15. wherewhatwho on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    As I recall 2 …
    As I recall 2 groups claimed responsibility and 1 identified the suicide bombers. It was Caspar Weinberger who stopped the response because he thought that it would harm relations in the ME. Reagan was wrong because he should have overode that decision. Besides, the French didn’t have a problem retaliating.

16. scarter32567 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    I’m the dumb ? …
    I’m the dumb ? What don’t you understand? 107-243 is exactly what I’m talking about, idiot. It is unconstitutional. They wrote 107-243 as a way to bypass the Constitution and give all power to Bush.
    Bush does have power over the military, but unless war is declared by Congress, the miltary cannot be utilized by the executive branch to wage war.

17. wherewhatwho on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    And Reagan was …
    And Reagan was wrong. We should have stopped it then and there.

18. wherewhatwho on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    You are a total …
    You are a total dumb . He didn’t violate the Constitution. War was never declared. He asked for authorization from Congress. If you read the Constitution instead of picking your nose, you will find that the President has full authority over the military and Congress granted him the right to use it against Iraq. Read Public Law 107-243 if you can comprehend that much.

19. fenderjbass77 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Reagan was right to …
    Reagan was right to pull out of Beirut and Ron Paul is right to pull out of Iraq. The invasion of Iraq is, was, and always will be unconstitutional. The US will have leaders on trial for war crimes. Aggressive Wars are the Highest Violation of international law and many in congress should be ashamed of shirking their Constitutional duty to stand up to a Power Hungry Executive.

20. fenderjbass77 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    I am a dumbass. lol …
    I am a dumbass. lol. Good post

21. scarter32567 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    We shouldn’t have …
    We shouldn’t have gone into Iraq and we should not go to Darfur either.
    If you want to go back in history, go back to the bombing of our embassy in Beirut in 1983. Reagan quickly withdrew our troops citing that he was not about to entangle our country in the radical politics of the Middle East. It is something that we cannot understand.

22. kac56 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Keith speaks the …
    Keith speaks the truth- regardless of what the idiots who still support bush and his lies say.

    Why is the one person responsible for 9/11 still out there taunting us? Does that bother any of you bush apologists? If you’re an American, it should.

23. fenderjbass77 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    “They violated The …
    “They violated The Constitution (Article 1 - Section 8).” You just proved yourself that the war is unconstitutional. Congress violated the Constituiton by turning over their Power to the executive without fundamentally rewriting A1-S8. Sounds like you’re on my side. Thanks!

24. scarter32567 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    Exactly my point. …
    Exactly my point. It is Congress’ EXCLUSIVE right to declare war, according to The Constitution. They, including Clinton, Edwards, etc. gave up their power of authority to Bush. They violated The Constitution (Article 1 - Section 8).
    So please tell me. How is the Iraq War not unconstitutional? Explain with facts how you came to this conclusion.

25. fenderjbass77 on August 2nd, 2009 at 4:17 am

    There is no war. …
    There is no war. Congress never declared war at all so of course it is not unconstitutional. Now the illegal US invasion of Iraq not only violates the US constitution but also international law. We will all learn about it when Bush/Cheney are on trial at the Hague.

Leave a Reply